The Court of Appeal in Abuja on Monday upheld the judgment of the Ekiti State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal which affirmed Governor Ayodele Fayose of the Peoples Democratic Party as the winner of the June 21, 2014 poll.

The Independent National Electoral Commission had declared that Fayose polled 203,090 votes to defeat the then incumbent governor, Dr. Kayode Fayemi, of the All Progressives Congress who polled 120,433 votes in the election.

Though the Justice Abdul Aboki-led five-man panel dismissed the appeal filed by the APC, it found merit in the appellant's complaints that the military was used to harass and intimidate its supporters and leaders during the polls.

In a unanimous judgment, the appellate court held that the Justice Siraju-Mohammed-led tribunal in its verdict delivered on December 19, 2014, "hurriedly" dismissed the appellant's allegations of harassment by the military on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction to hear such.

He held that though the tribunal had rightly struck out the names of the Chief of Army Staff and the Inspector General of Police as respondents in the petition in accordance with provisions of the Electoral Act, it ought to have determined the appellant's complaints and considered the two parties as agents of INEC or individuals working on behalf of the commission.

The court, however, held that the entire appeal lacked merit since the main issues of alleged forgery of Higher National Diploma by Fayose and request for his disqualification on the grounds of his earlier impeachment from office in 2006 had been resolved against him.

It, however, reiterated that the use of Armed Forces in the conduct of elections was in violation of section 217(2)(c) of the Constitution and section 1 of the Armed Forces Act.

It cited and relied on a judgment delivered by Justice R. M Aikawa of the Federal High Court in Sokoto on January 29, 2015 barring the use of the Armed Forces in the conduct of elections.

The appellate court therefore barred the use of the Armed Forces in the conduct of future elections in the country as such constituted a violation of both the constitution and the Electoral Act.

Justice Aboki held, "Even the President of Nigeria has no powers to call on the Nigerian Armed Forces to unleash them on peaceful citizenry who are exercising their franchise to elect their leaders.

"In the event of insurrection or insurgency, the call on the Armed Forces to restore order must be with approval of the National Assembly… as provided in section 217(2) and 218(4) of the Constitution as amended.

"The question is that who ordered deployment of military or soldiers at the Ekiti governorship election? Was there any act of insurrection to warrant the call on the military to restore order? And was such deployment in accordance with sections 217 (2)(c) and 218(4) of the constitution?

"There is nothing before us in the records in answering the posers positively.

"With this, whoever unleashed soldiers on Ekiti State disturbed the peace of the election on June 21, 2014, acted in flagrant breach of the constitution, and flouted the provisions of the Electoral Act which required an enabling environment by civil authorities in the conduct of elections.

"We resolve that although the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the 4th and 5the respondents (Inspector General of Police and Chief of Army Staff), in the circumstances, that did not stop it from making a pronouncement on deprecating the unlawful role of the military in the conduct of election in Ekiti State.

"Since the tribunal had made a finding that pleading by parties revealed a consensus that soldiers were used in the conduct of the election. It must be stated, by way of emphasis that the Armed Forces have no role in the conduct of election must not be involved except perhaps, in the area of providing logistics services to the agencies of government in the preparation for the election."

@blackboxupdate